Would I need a living trust or what forms would I need?

A sensible way to transfer assets to children, in the event of your death, is through a revocable living trust.

Transferring assets to children through a last will generally gives the children assets at age 18, Most of my clients believe that children cannot manage assets at that age.

Another common way to transfer assets is a trust inside a last will. The assets can be held for a longer time period. However, you have to probate the will in order to get to the trust. A probate generally means extra time and costs.

A revocable (changeable) living (established during your lifetime) trust works well because it is set up during your lifetime, you can change it over time and it allows you to give your assets to children when you want and exactly the way you want.

You will need an estate planning attorney to draft the trust for you. The attorney will need to prepare a “pour over” last will as well as the trust to make certain all of your assets are controlled by the trust.

This answer does not constitute legal advice and does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The law may vary depending on the state in which you reside. It is intended only to give some direction in which to seek assistance.

Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, I am now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Anyone who has been following our blog knows that the expiring Bush tax cuts (including the repeal of the estate tax this year and the tax’s reinstatement next year) have given lawmakers no end of trouble as they struggle and debate—and debate and struggle—to agree on new tax legislation moving forward. In fact, The Wall Street Journal calls the issue “a ticking time bomb,” while the New York Times warns that “an epic fight is brewing.” It seems that the only thing everyone does agree on is that something has to be done before December 31, 2010.

Unfortunately, according to both news sources, politics takes precedence over legislation. “The tax fight will serve as a proxy for the bigger political clashes of the year, including the size of government and the best way of handling the tepid economic recovery,” warns David M. Herszenhorn of the NY Times, “’…this is code for the role of the federal government, the debate over the size of government and the priorities of the nation.’”

According to David Wessel of the WSJ party lines are clearly drawn. “The Obama administration is pressing to extend the Bush tax cuts for everyone with an income under $250,000 a year and to raise taxes on those above. A recent Pew/National Journal poll found that only 11% of Democrats favor extending all the Bush tax cuts.” Meanwhile, “Republicans are happily staking out the no-new-taxes turf, playing to their traditional constituency. Pew says 52% of Republicans favor extending all the Bush tax cuts.”

It would certainly give taxpayers some comfort if legislation could be passed quickly and decisively, but Herszenhorn warns that it’s not likely to happen, “Given the partisan gridlock of recent months, there is a chance that the battle could go down to the last minute, or even — in the face of a stalemate — that the tax cuts could be allowed to expire completely, a development that… lawmakers in both parties say could be the worst outcome.”

Either way, the best advice we can give our readers is to be prepared. Just because lawmakers keep putting off a decision doesn’t mean you should. Talk to your attorney about the best way for your family to weather the coming storm. Be aware of changes to tax laws and update your estate plan accordingly.

www.blogprofs.com

Everything was divided equally among the children according to their will.

There is a hierarchy to paying taxes when someone dies. The general rule is that the Trust must pay any tax liabilities. If the Trust does not pay the taxes and there are assets with which to pay the taxes, the Trustee may be personally liable. Finally, if the Trustee fails to pay, and the beneficiaries have received assets from the trust, the IRS may hold the beneficiaries responsible.

The simple rule is to pay the taxes first.

This answer does not constitute legal advice and does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The law may vary depending on the state in which you reside. It is intended only to give some direction in which to seek assistance.

Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, I am now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Everybody thinks it won’t happen to them. Or rather, everybody knows it’s going to happen to them eventually, but nobody thinks it’s going to happen tomorrow, or next week, or even next year. The “it” of which I speak is, of course, death. It is this perceived immortality that allows so many people to put off their estate planning until it is too late.

But today’s blog post is not a cautionary tale about a family who put off their planning and regretted it, today’s post is about the peace and relief that forethought and planning brings not just to your family, but to you as the person making the plan.

In this article in Market Watch Chuck Jaffe tells the moving story of his brother Rob, who insisted 2 years ago on creating an estate plan even though he and his wife were both healthy. As Jaffe puts it, “While not pleasant subject matter, it was not morbid… you’d rather be drinking lemonade on the veranda, but it wasn’t a sharp stick in the eye.” However, when Rob became unexpectedly ill in May of this year the estate plan turned out to be a comfort to Rob and his family—such a comfort, according to Jaffe, that Rob “made me [Chuck] promise that I would write about him… when his time was up, because his story would help others.”

“People need to understand… how big a blessing it is to know — when their time comes — that they have everything in order, that they don’t need to stress or worry about how things they worked their whole life for are going to turn out. … I would not want to waste a minute of my life now having to do estate planning or worrying that I live long enough to get documents filed or whatever garbage comes with it… Focusing on death and dying while you are living, that’s easy; having to focus on death when you are dying, that would be unimaginable.”

In our business we frequently see how much easier it is for people to create a plan when they’re healthy, as opposed to the stress that comes with creating a plan when they are sick. Thank you Mr. Jaffe for sharing your brother’s moving story. We hope that your (and your brother’s) words will help motivate others to take comfort in planning ahead.

www.blogprofs.com

If a married woman dies and had a valid will; owned a house with her husband and 4 (independent) adult children, is it necessary to file for probate? Her Will stipulated that “…bequeath to my husband….. all of the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, whether real or personal………”. There is no Community Property Agreement.

Your question is not only about probate. The question is about whether or not the assets must pass through the probate process to go to her beneficiaries. If the assets were held jointly with her husband, the assets would pass to him by operation of law. No probate is needed. In addition, the community property agreement would not help answer your question.

I would recommend that you see an attorney in your area to see if a probate is necessary. Many times a probate is not needed. The attorney will need to see the will and a list of all of her assets.

This answer does not constitute legal advice and does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The law may vary depending on the state in which you reside. It is intended only to give some direction in which to seek assistance.

Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, I am now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Our country may be facing a simultaneous growth and recession… unfortunately, according to journalist John Leland, the two seem to be at odds. What we are referring to is the growth of the elderly population and the recession of funds available to help this aging community pay for the care they need.

The economic downturn of the past few years has hit the elderly with a double-whammy. Many of them lost close to all of their savings when the stock market bottomed out, and now budget cuts to state-funded home-care services threaten to force many of them out of their homes and into hospitals or nursing facilities.

“’I’m not getting a cost-of-living adjustment, and now I’m not getting food,’ said Joyce Plennert, 83, who is on a waiting list for Meals on Wheels in Palatine, Ill. ‘Now I’m worried my home services will be cut. Without that, I’d be in a nursing home, if I could find one with room.’”

According to the above-mentioned NY Times article, a number of states have already made cuts to home-care services, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York and Texas. “The situation is grim, and it’s safe to say that present trends are expected to continue,”

These budget cuts impact more than just senior citizens—they affect the professional caregivers and home aides who lose their jobs when state programs are cancelled, as well as the families of the elderly. When these seniors lose their ability to live at home it’s their families who will have to pick up the slack either by contributing to the costs of care or more often by become the caregiver themselves.

If you or a loved one is facing a loss of benefits due to budget cuts don’t be afraid to explore your options. Geriatric care managers can help families through confusing times, and other advisors such as elder lawyers, estate planners, financial planners and others can offer invaluable advice when creating your plan for the future.

www.blogprofs.com

My partner’s father may become a permanent resident at a nursing home. I have been living on the property, rent-free, but providing much service, for many years, i.e. buying groceries and cooking, cleaning, yard work, lawn mowing, minor repairs, homemaking, companion services and personal assistance, especially when the parents were ill. Now it seems the absent family members feel that since I’ve had a ” roof over my head”, I have been paid enough. The house is extremely humble and in disrepair, the elderly man very unkind and unappreciative, but 90, and needing some help and protection. He would not ever talk about this, or acknowledge my helpfulness. He may or may not come home, but if he does, the level of care will be much increased, and I need to find out where I stand before I continue.

I am so sorry for your situation. Many caregivers face the same situation every day.

I would recommend that you make a detailed list of all the things you have done on a weekly basis. List each item specifically and the amount of time spent on each chore. The more detail you put in the list the better. Also list places you have been on behalf of the individual. For example, grocery shopping – 3 times each week. List the mileage and the time. List everything you can think of now, while it is fresh in your mind.

Then add up the list of hours for the month.

Take the detailed list to a local estate attorney. They will help you to put the documents in the proper format. They will be able to help you determine the value for each hour of time for these services in your area. They will also be able to tell you how many months/years you can go back with your list. The attorney may also deduct the value of the rent in your area. Then the attorney will help you to present the bill to the family.

The time to act is now. Good luck.

This answer does not constitute legal advice and does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The law may vary depending on the state in which you reside. It is intended only to give some direction in which to seek assistance.

Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, I am now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Estate planning can be a pretty involved affair, even for people whose lives are fairly straightforward; but if you are an ex-patriot, have dual citizenship, or plan to leave assets to family members in another country the estate planning process can by downright mind-boggling. This is because each country is going to have its own laws regarding heirs and distribution, while some governments (according to this article in the New York Times) will even “require their citizens or residents to pass assets on to people other than those whom they would choose.”

The United States has avoided these “forced-heirship” laws (although your state’s laws regarding distribution of assets in the absence of a will or estate plan may feel like forced-heirship), but these laws “are prevalent in many parts of the world, notably the Middle East, where Islamic law predominates, and continental Europe.” If you are a United States citizen residing in one of these “forced-heirship” countries—or if you are a citizen of one of these countries residing in the United States—you will definitely want to talk to your attorney about how best to protect your family and your assets.

Just how you will go about building your web of protection will depend on a number of variables, including your citizenship, your country of residence, and in which country the assets were acquired or are held. Most estate planners agree that a trust is generally the best way to go about protecting your assets, but a trust may not work in every situation. “The legal systems that have forced-heirship rules tend not to recognize trusts.” You may find that you’ll have to set up a will or estate plan in two places: one in your country of origin and one in your country of residence.

And of course international estate planning is not all about heirs and distribution—especially if you have young children. International guardianship documents should be carefully drafted and should include provisions for temporary guardians, travel arrangements, and medical powers of attorney for minors.

Living in a global community has its pros and its cons—the best way to successfully span two countries or cultures is to be flexible… and be prepared!

www.blogprofs.com

Families have a way of acquiring great numbers of treasured objects and mementos: photo albums, antique books, Wedgewood China… a mounted deer head? You just never know what’s going to end up in the trash-heap and what will be kept and passed on to the next generation. Ellen Lupton mentions in her recent article in the New York Times that she and her husband kept the Wedgewood China and (surprisingly enough) the deer head. But the question she puts forth is… why?

Lupton’s article, entitled How to Lose a Legacy, makes the point that the difference between old stuff as trash and old stuff as treasure lies largely with you and how you choose to leave all this stuff to your heirs. “You can’t buy an heirloom at Pottery Barn or IKEA. It comes via gift, bequest or a heated sibling brawl.”

Lupton says early on in her article that “Even folks in the ‘die broke’ crowd, determined to enjoy their remaining assets rather than leave them to the ungrateful grandkids, may secretly hope the family will love and honor their dearest possessions.” But secret hopes aren’t of any use to your children or grandchildren after you’ve passed away. Part of the job of an estate planner is to help you express these secret hopes to your heirs and leave your treasured possessions in safe and appreciative hands.

Of course your heirs are going to have minds (and memories) of their own, and your treasured silver cake platter could still end up in the local antique store; but the best way to keep your treasures in the family is to make sure your family knows your wishes. If they know how much your grandmother’s English tea set meant to you (and why it meant so much to you) it’s going to mean that much more to them.

You may share a life and history with your heirs, but you can’t expect them to read your mind. If you can put your stuff into context—let each heirloom tell a part of your story and reflect a meaningful relationship—the legacy you leave will be priceless.

www.blogprofs.com

Do I need a trust?

I believe that you need a will and a trust. The last will states who will serve as guardian for your children in the event of the death of both parents. Also, if both of you are gone, the trust will enable you to creatively manage the assets for the benefit of your children and their caregivers, without court entanglement.

Seek a qualified estate planning attorney in your area to help you.

This answer does not constitute legal advice and does not and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The law may vary depending on the state in which you reside. It is intended only to give some direction in which to seek assistance.

Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, I am now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.